Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression - Double-blind, randomised comparison

Citation
Mf. Poirier et P. Boyer, Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression - Double-blind, randomised comparison, BR J PSYCHI, 175, 1999, pp. 12-16
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry","Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
ISSN journal
00071250 → ACNP
Volume
175
Year of publication
1999
Pages
12 - 16
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1250(199907)175:<12:VAPITD>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Background About one-third of patients fail to respond to initial antidepre ssant therapy, which suggests a need for more effective drugs. Aims To compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine and paroxetine in 12 2 patients with non-chronic treatment-resistant depression. Method In-patients or out-patients satisfying DSM-III-R criteria for major depression in evolution for less than eight months, having a baseline HAM-D score greater than or equal to 18 and a HAM-D Item 3 score < 3 were eligib le. Patients were required to have a history of resistance to two previous antidepressant treatments and a CGI improvement score of 3 at the beginning of treatment. Doses were adjusted to 200-300 mg/day for venlafaxine and 30 -40 mg/day for paroxetine. Results For the observed-case analysis, the response rate was 51.9% for ven lafaxine and 32.7% for paroxetine (P=0.044), and a remission was achieved i n 42.3% of venlafaxine-treated and 20.0% of paroxetine-treated patients (P= 0.01). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between treatment gr oups. Conclusions Venlafaxine showed some evidence of superiority to paroxetine i n this difficult-to-treat patient population. Declaration of interest Supported by a grant from Wyeth-Lederle, Paris, Fra nce.