Comparison of three methods of measuring surface area of soils

Authors
Citation
E. De Jong, Comparison of three methods of measuring surface area of soils, CAN J SOIL, 79(2), 1999, pp. 345-351
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00084271 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
345 - 351
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-4271(199905)79:2<345:COTMOM>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Surface area (SA) is an important property of soils, but different methods can give widely different estimates of SA, and of the contribution of organ ic matter to SA. This study was undertaken to compare two common methods of measuring SA (EGME [ethylene glycol monoethyl ether] and N-2 sorption) wit h SA estimates using H2O sorption on selected Saskatchewan soils; some soil s from Kenya were included to show the impact of clay mineralogy. For the S askatchewan soils, the three estimates of SA were highly correlated to each other and to clay content, but SA EGME was 2 to 3 times SA H2O and 7 to 52 times SA N-2. Organic matter did not appear to contribute to SA EGME, incr eased SA H2O and decreased SA N-2. Clearly the three methods differ in thei r access to internal and external surface area and this should affect their utility as indices of the sorptive capacity of field soils.