According to currently accepted theories, rapidly evolving nucleotide sites
are phylogenetically less informative than more slowly evolving ones, espe
cially for recognizing more ancient groupings. For this reason third codon
positions are often regarded as less reliable than first and second positio
ns as indicators of phylogeny. Analysis of the largest nucleotide matrix tr
eated to date-2538 rbcL sequences covering all major lineages of green plan
ts-shows the opposite: although rapidly evolving and highly homoplastic, th
ird positions contain most of the phylogenetic structure in the data. Frequ
ency of change should thus be used with caution as a criterion for weightin
g or selecting characters, (C) 1999 The Willi Hennig Society.