Optimization of allopurinol challenge: Sample purification, protein intakecontrol, and the use of orotidine response as a discriminative variable improve performance of the test for diagnosing ornithine carbamoyltransferasedeficiency
Ja. Arranz et al., Optimization of allopurinol challenge: Sample purification, protein intakecontrol, and the use of orotidine response as a discriminative variable improve performance of the test for diagnosing ornithine carbamoyltransferasedeficiency, CLIN CHEM, 45(7), 1999, pp. 995-1001
Background: The diagnosis of heterozygosity for X-linked ornithine carbamoy
ltransferase (OCT) deficiency has usually been based on measurement of the
increase of orotate and orotidine excretion after an allopurinol load. We e
xamined the choices of analyte, cutoff, and test conditions to obtain maxim
al test accuracy.
Methods: Urine orotate/orotidine responses to allopurinol load in 37 childr
en (13 OCT-deficient and 24 non-OCT-deficient) and 24 women (7 at risk for
carrier status and 17 not related to OCT-deficient children) were analyzed
by liquid chromatography after sample purification by anion-exchange chroma
tography. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by nonparametric ROC curves.
Results: Sample purification was necessary to prevent interferences. Orotat
e and orotidine excretion increased with increased protein intake during th
e test. At a cutoff of 8 mmol orotidine/mol creatinine, sensitivity was 1.0
and specificity was 0.92 in mild forms of OCT deficiency. Results in monop
lex carrier women may differ greatly from those expected because of the gen
etics of this deficiency.
Conclusions: Standardization of protein intake is required in the allopurin
ol loading test. A negative response in the face of clinical suspicion shou
ld be followed with a repeat test during a protein intake not <2.5 g.kg(-1)
.day(-1). Measurements of orotidine provide better clinical sensitivity tha
n measurements of orotate. (C) 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemi
stry.