In a two-center (Academic Medical Center, The Netherlands, and National Ins
titutes of Health, USA) study, we compared ionized magnesium (iMg(2+)) resu
lts in serum determined with the AVL 988/4, KONE Microlyte 6 and NOVA CRT,
which are the currently available analyzers equipped with a magnesium ion-s
elective electrode. The comparison was performed with frozen serum samples
from normal individuals and patients. Imprecision and reference intervals w
ere established. We found the best agreement between the KONE(x) and AVL(y)
magnesium ion-selective electrodes (y = 0.972x-0.013; n = 138) with sample
s from patients. With samples from normals, all three analyzers reported si
gnificantly different results (p < 0.05). Best precision was found using th
e NOVA; coefficients of variation established at three levels were all <4.0
%. Coefficients of variation for the AVL and KONE were <5% at normal and hi
gh iMg(2+), but 10.7 and 9.4%, respectively, at iMg(2+) approximate to 0.30
mmol/l. The reference intervals (mean +/- standard deviation) based on mea
surements in fresh serum samples were different for each analyzer: 0.55-0.6
3 mmol/l for AVL, 0.470.57 mmol/l for KONE and 0.43-0.55 mmol/l for NOVA. T
hus, significant differences among the ionized magnesium concentration obta
ined with the three analyzers, limit comparison of results in clinical prac
tice, and need to be resolved (e.g. by improvement of specificity and stand
ardization of calibrators).