The minimum number of teeth needed to satisfy functional demands has been t
he subject of several studies. However, since functional demands - and cons
equently the number of teeth needed - can vary from individual to individua
l, this minimum number cannot be defined exactly. In general, occlusion of
a complete dental arch is preferable. However, this goal might be neither a
ttainable, for general, dental or financial reasons, nor necessary. Many st
udies demonstrate that shortened dental arches comprising the anterior and
premolar regions fan meet the requirements of a functional dentition. Conse
quently, when priorities have to be set, restorative therapy should be aime
d at preserving the most strategic parts of the dental arch: the anterior a
nd premolar regions. This also implies that in cases of a shortened dental
arch, the prompt replacement of absent posterior molars by free-end removab
le partial dentures leads to overtreatment and discomfort. The shortened de
ntal arch concept is based on circumstantial evidence: it does not contradi
ct current theories of occlusion and fits well with a problem-solving appro
ach. The concept offers some important advantages and may be considered a s
trategy to reduce the need for complex restorative treatment in the posteri
or regions of the mouth.