Av. Peddada et al., CHEMOTHERAPY AND LOW-DOSE RADIOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE ANAL-CANAL, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 37(5), 1997, pp. 1101-1105
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and tolerance of a standardized pro
tocol of chemotherapy and low-dose radiotherapy in the treatment of an
al cancer in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Met
hods and Materials: Between 1987 and 1995, eight HIV-positive patients
with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal, four of whom had acqu
ired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), received therapy at the Raiser
Permanente Medical Center. All patients were treated using a combined
modality approach consisting of low-dose radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 fra
ctions delivered 5 days/week), and chemotherapy [1000 mg/m(2) of 5-flu
orouracil (5-FU) delivered on days 1-4 and 29-32 as a continuous infus
ion over 96 h, and 10 mg/m(2) of mitomycin C delivered as a bolus inje
ction on day 1]. Patients have been followed from 4 to 81 months (mean
41, median 38). Results: All eight patients completed the therapy wit
h minor variations to the protocol, and all have attained a clinical c
omplete response. Four patients are alive and free of disease, and fou
r died as a result of complications of AIDS, but remained free of anal
carcinoma. There were no mortalities from the protocol and the morbid
ity was acceptable. Only one patient each was noted to have Radiation
Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatmen
t of Cancer Grade 4 hematologic and gastrointestinal acute toxicity, a
nd no Grade 4 skin toxicity was noted. Conclusion: This combined thera
py is effective for HIV-infected patients and appears to be tolerable
with acceptable toxicities. It is best applied to patients who are HIV
positive, or who have AIDS without concurrent major opportunistic inf
ections. This approach is reasonable and affords patients a reasonably
good chance at sphincter preservation by avoiding abdominoperineal re
section. The optimal therapy for HIV-positive patients with advanced A
IDS remains less well defined. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.