We optimize the trade-off between economic and ecological concerns in conse
rvation biology by using a novel method to link a spatially explicit indivi
dual-based model to a dynamic programming model. To date, few optimality mo
dels have been presented to optimize this trade-off, especially when the co
mmon currency cannot be easily measured in dollars. We use a population sim
ulation model (e.g. spatially explicit individual-based model) to model a h
ypothetical forest bird population's response to different cutting and plan
ting regimes. We then link these results to a dynamic programming model to
determine the optimal choice a manager should make at each time step to min
imize revenue foregone by not harvesting timber while maintaining a given p
opulation of birds. Our results show that if optimal management choices are
made further back in time, future (terminal) reward may be greater. As the
end of the management period approaches, past management practices influen
ce the terminal reward more than future practices can. Thus if past revenue
lost is high, the future reward will be low as compared to when past reven
ue lost is low. The general strategy of setting some minimum viable populat
ion size and then using a population simulator linked to a dynamic programm
ing model to ask how to maintain such a population size with minimum econom
ic loss should have nearly universal applicability in conservation biology.
(C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.