The paper takes stock of the advances and directions for research on the in
complete contracting front. It first illustrates some of the main ideas of
the incomplete contract literature through an example. It then offers metho
dological insights on the standard approach to modeling incomplete contract
s; in particular it discusses a tension between two assumptions made in the
literature, namely rationality and the existence of transaction costs. Las
t, it argues that, contrary to what is commonly argued, the complete contra
ct methodology need not be unable to account for standard institutions such
as authority and ownership; and it concludes with a discussion of the rese
arch agenda.