The quality of abstracting medical information from the medical record: the impact of training programmes

Citation
L. Lorenzoni et al., The quality of abstracting medical information from the medical record: the impact of training programmes, INT J QUAL, 11(3), 1999, pp. 209-213
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
ISSN journal
13534505 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
209 - 213
Database
ISI
SICI code
1353-4505(199906)11:3<209:TQOAMI>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a programme of training, education and awareness on the quality of the data collected through discharge abstracts . Study design: Three random samples of hospital discharge abstracts relating to three different periods were studied. Quality control to evaluate the i mpact of systematic training and education activities was performed by chec king the quality of abstracting medical records. Setting: The study was carried out at the Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacol ata, a research hospital in Rome, Italy; it has 335 beds specializing in de rmatology and vascular surgery. Measures: Error rates in discharge abstracts were subdivided into six categ ories: wrong selection of the principal diagnosis (type A); low specificity of the principal diagnosis (type B); incomplete reporting of secondary dia gnoses (type C); wrong selection of the principal procedure (type D); low s pecificity of the principal procedure (type E); incomplete reporting of pro cedures (type F). A specific rate of errors modifying classification in dia gnosis related groups was then estimated. Results: Error types A, B and F dropped from 8.5% to 1.3%, from 15.8% to 1. 6% and from 22% to 2.6% respectively. Error type D and E were zero in the t hird period of analysis (September-October 1997) compared with a rate of 0. 7% and 4.1% in the third quarter of 1994. Error type C showed a slight decr ease from 31.8% in 1994 to 27.2% in 1997. All differences in error types ex cept incomplete reporting of secondary diagnoses were statistically signifi cant. Five and a half per cent of cases were assigned to a different diagno ses related group after re-abstracting in 1997 as compared to 24.3% in the third quarter of 1994 and 23.8% in the first quarter of 1995. Discussion: Training and continuous monitoring, and feedback of information to departments have proved to be successful in improving the quality of ab stracting information at patient level from the medical record. The effort to increase administrative data quality at hospital level will facilitate t he use of those data sets for internal quality management activities and fo r population-based quality of care studies.