Purpose: To compare the learning curve in a series of 200 cataract surgerie
s performed using small incision nucleus capture with that: of phacoemulsif
ication as reported in the literature.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Methods: Two hundred eyes of 163 consecutive patients with cataract had sma
ll incision nucleus capture, a relatively new cataract surgery technique th
at allows small incisions and in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation Pati
ents were divided into 4 groups of 50 each according to when they had surge
ry between August 1996 and October 1997. The incidence of intraoperative co
mplications (capsule break with or without vitreous loss, capsulorhexis tea
rs, Descemet's detachment, transient iris damage) and postoperative complic
ations (raised intraocular pressure, corneal epithelial edema, Descemet's f
olds, and permanent iris damage) were evaluated at the different time point
s. Also recorded was final visual acuity. These results were compared with
those obtained with phacoemulsification.
Results: The study comprised 92 women and 71 men with an age range of 41 to
93 years. Overall final results showed that the learning curve of nucleus
capture is comparable to that of phacoemulsification.
Conclusion: Nucleus capture cataract extraction resulted in a low incidence
of complications and good visual recovery that was comparable to that obta
ined with phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25:959-974 (C)
1999 ASCRS and ESCRS.