Small incision nucleus capture: Results of 200 cases

Citation
Sc. Sacca et al., Small incision nucleus capture: Results of 200 cases, J CAT REF S, 25(7), 1999, pp. 969-974
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
ISSN journal
08863350 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
969 - 974
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-3350(199907)25:7<969:SINCRO>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the learning curve in a series of 200 cataract surgerie s performed using small incision nucleus capture with that: of phacoemulsif ication as reported in the literature. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. Methods: Two hundred eyes of 163 consecutive patients with cataract had sma ll incision nucleus capture, a relatively new cataract surgery technique th at allows small incisions and in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation Pati ents were divided into 4 groups of 50 each according to when they had surge ry between August 1996 and October 1997. The incidence of intraoperative co mplications (capsule break with or without vitreous loss, capsulorhexis tea rs, Descemet's detachment, transient iris damage) and postoperative complic ations (raised intraocular pressure, corneal epithelial edema, Descemet's f olds, and permanent iris damage) were evaluated at the different time point s. Also recorded was final visual acuity. These results were compared with those obtained with phacoemulsification. Results: The study comprised 92 women and 71 men with an age range of 41 to 93 years. Overall final results showed that the learning curve of nucleus capture is comparable to that of phacoemulsification. Conclusion: Nucleus capture cataract extraction resulted in a low incidence of complications and good visual recovery that was comparable to that obta ined with phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25:959-974 (C) 1999 ASCRS and ESCRS.