Specificity of HercepTest in determining HER-2/neu status of breast cancers using the united states food and drug administration-approved scoring system
Tw. Jacobs et al., Specificity of HercepTest in determining HER-2/neu status of breast cancers using the united states food and drug administration-approved scoring system, J CL ONCOL, 17(7), 1999, pp. 1983-1987
Purpose: To evaluate the specificity of the HercepTest for Immunoenzymatic
Staining (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA) for determining HER-2/neu protein exp
ression in breast cancer.
Materials and Methods: Forty-eight invasive breast cancers previously found
to be HER-S/neu-negative by two different immunohistochemical (IHC) assays
and not amplified for the HER-S/neu gene by fluorescence in situ hybridiza
tion were studied using the HercepTest kit. HercepTest was performed accord
ing to the manufacturer's guidelines, and the results were scored on a 0 to
3+ scale using the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approv
ed grading system. In this system, cases scored as 2+ or 3+ are considered
HER-S/neu-positive.
Results: Among these 48 cases, the IHC score using the FDA-approved scaring
system wets 0 in four cases (8.3%), 1+ in 16 (33.3%), 2+ in 21 (43.8%), an
d 3+ in seven (14.6%), Therefore, 58.4% of these cases were categorized as
HER-2/neu-positive, and the specificity of the HercepTest kit for HER-2/neu
expression was 41.6%. However, with the use of a modified scaring system t
hat took into account the level of staining of nonneoplastic epithelium, th
e specificity increased to 93.2%.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that the HercepTest kit, when used in acco
rdance with the manufacturer's guidelines and the FDA-approved scoring syst
em, results in a large proportion of breast cancers being categorized as po
sitive for HER-2/neu protein expression and that many of these seem to be f
alse-positives. Consideration of the level of staining of nonneoplastic epi
thelium resulted in improved specificity. The current FDA-approved scoring
system for HercepTest results should be reevaluated before its widespread u
se in clinical practice. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.