Sk. Parsons et al., Quality-adjusted survival after treatment for acute myeloid leukemia in childhood: A Q-TWiST analysis of the Pediatric Oncology Group study 8821, J CL ONCOL, 17(7), 1999, pp. 2144-2152
purpose: Ta describe quality-of-life considerations in postremission therap
ies for children with acute myelogenous leukemia.
Patients and Methods: A quality-adjusted survival analysis, using the quali
ty-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) method, was applied
to Pediatric Oncology Group Trial 8821,which compared randomized assignmen
t with intensive consolidation chemotherapy (CC) or autologous bone marrow
trans plantation (ABMT), Nonrandomized assignment to allogeneic bone marrow
transplantation (allo BMT) on the basis of availability of a matched relat
ed donor wets also evaluated. A 25 patient cohort provided data for modelin
g chronic graft-versus-host disease. The TWiST analysis war performed based
on the intent-to-treat principle.
Results: As previously reported, the 3 year event-free survival was not sig
nificantly different between the randomized arms (CC v ABMT), At a median f
ollow-up of 5 years (of the censoring distribution), the CC group had less
time in toxicity (TOX) and more time without symptoms ar toxicity (TWiST),
relapse-free time, and alive time than patients assigned to ABMT (none of t
hese were statistically significant). Compared with the CC group alla BMT p
atients spent more time in TOX (P <.001), more time in TWiST (P =.06), and
had more relapse-free time (P =.03) and time alive (P = .07), Allo BMT was
superior to ABMT with greater time in TWiST (P =.03), relapse-free time (P
=.01), and time alive P = .002).
Conclusion: The Q-TWiST analysis is a powerful decision aid in choosing amo
ng alternative therapies. prospective information on patient preferences wi
ll facilitate future trials evaluating treatment outcomes. Refinements in t
he Q-TWiST method could be included to further enhance the power of this pa
tient care decisionmaking tool.