Reliable high risk HPV DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction: an intermethod and intramethod comparison

Citation
Mv. Jacobs et al., Reliable high risk HPV DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction: an intermethod and intramethod comparison, J CLIN PATH, 52(7), 1999, pp. 498-503
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00219746 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
498 - 503
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9746(199907)52:7<498:RHRHDT>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background-The development of a reproducible, sensitive, and standardised h uman papillomavirus (HPV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test is required to implement HPV testing in cervical cancer screening programmes and for tr iaging women with mild to moderate dysplasia. Aims-To determine the intermethod agreement between different GP5+/6+ and M Y09/11 PCR based protocols for the detection and typing of high risk (HR) H PV DNA in cervical smears and to assess the intramethod reproducibility of the GP5+/6+ PCR enzyme immunoassay (ELA) for HR-HPV detection. Methods-For the intermethod comparison, crude aliquots of 20 well character ised cervical smears comprising five HPV negative samples, and six and nine samples containing single and multiple HPV infections, respectively were c oded and sent from reference laboratory (A) to three other laboratories. On e of these (laboratory B) used the GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA and was provided with st andard protocols. Another laboratory (C) used GP5+/6+ PCR combined with seq uence analysis and type specific PCR, whereas two laboratories (D and E) us ed MY09/11 PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis for the detection and typing of HR-HPV. The intramethod agreement of GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA was analysed in a subsequent study with four other labor atories (F to I) on crude aliquots of 50 well characterised cervical smears , consisting of 32 HR-HPV positive and 18 HPV negative samples. Standardise d protocols, primers, and probes were also provided by the reference labora tory for HR-HPV detection. Results-In the intermethod comparison, pairwise agreement of the different laboratories with reference laboratory A for the detection of HR-HPV varied between 75% and 100% (kappa values: 0.5 to 1). Typing data revealed a broa der range in pairwise agreement rates between 32% and 100%. The highest agr eement was found between laboratories A and B using standardised protocols and validated reagents. In the intramethod evaluation, pairwise comparison of the laboratories F to I with reference laboratory A revealed excellent a greement rates from 92% to 100% (kappa values: 0.88 to 1.0) with an overall sensitivity of 97.5% (195/200) and specificity of 99.5% (199/200). Conclusions-The detection of HR-HPV as a group is highly reproducible with GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA provided that standardised protocols and validated reagents are used.