Growth and the cycle: Creative destruction versus entrenchment

Citation
E. Canton et H. Uhlig, Growth and the cycle: Creative destruction versus entrenchment, J ECON, 69(3), 1999, pp. 239-266
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE
ISSN journal
09318658 → ACNP
Volume
69
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
239 - 266
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-8658(1999)69:3<239:GATCCD>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Newly established firms often try to secure their market position by buildi ng up a base of loyal customers. While recessions may not destroy technolog ical leadership, they may be harmful for such firm-customer relationships. Without such customer bases, these firms find themselves more vulnerable to attacks by competitors. We formulate this idea within an Aghion-Howitt-typ e model of creative destruction and discuss its implications for growth. In the context of this model, recessions might be good for growth since they weaken the incumbent firm's position and, thereby, stimulate research by ou tside firms. The model allows for the extreme case where the leading firm c an be so entrenched that growth ceases, unless a recession shakes up its cu stomer base. We find a one-to-one relationship between the average growth r ate and the cyclical variability, a U-shaped relationship between the avera ge speed of building up good customer relationships and the average growth rate, and a positive relationship between the arrival rate of recessions an d average growth. It is finally shown that an appropriate stochastic tax pr ogram can implement the social planner's solution. In some cases, general-e quilibrium effects may generate interesting results, conflicting with intui tion from a partial-equilibrium approach: we show that, in some cases, a so cial planner might want to subsidize research in order to discourage it.