In this paper, we analyze recent rural strategy initiatives in England in a
n attempt to explore the relationship between planning policy and the provi
sion of outdoor recreation. Notwithstanding a wider rhetoric of accessibili
ty to che countryside, much recreational planning activity has been based o
n the discriminatory notion of acceptable leisure activities. Acceptability
in this case is associated with a land use planning system in which land i
tself assumes a form of naturalness, in contrast to its uses, which are see
n to be socially constructed. This dualism is based nor on any definition o
f demand, need, or public interest, bur on a continuing spatial determinism
in which rights of land ownership are constructed as both socially and mor
ally superior co other rights. This continues to legitimize a rationalized
form of protection through che statutory planning system.