Ja. Rodgers et Ht. Smith, BUFFER ZONE DISTANCES TO PROTECT FORAGING AND LEAFING WATERBIRDS FROMHUMAN DISTURBANCE IN FLORIDA, Wildlife Society bulletin, 25(1), 1997, pp. 139-145
Sixteen species of waterbirds (Pelecaniformes, Ciconiiformes, Charadri
iformes) in north and central Florida were exposed to 4 types of human
disturbances (walking, all-terrain vehicle, automobile, boat) to dete
rmine buffer zones that minimize flushing of foraging or leafing birds
. Both intraspecific and interspecific variation were observed in flus
hing-response distances to the same type of disturbance. Buffer zones
were estimated using a formula based on the mean plus 1.6495 standard
deviations of the observed flushing distance plus 40 m (buffer distanc
e = exp [mu + 1.6495 sigma] + 40). A buffer of about 100 m should mini
mize disturbance to most species of waterbirds we studied in Florida.
We recommend follow-up studies to test our buffer distances for other
species and disturbance situations.