Jf. Walker et al., Suppression of ectomycorrhizae on canopy tree seedlings in Rhododendron maximum L-(Ericaceae) thickets in the southern Appalachians, MYCORRHIZA, 9(1), 1999, pp. 49-56
Thickets of Rhododendron maximum(Ericaceae) (Rm) in the southern Appalachia
ns severely limit regeneration of hardwood and coniferous seedlings. Experi
mental blocks were established in and out of Rm thickets in a mature, mixed
hardwood/conifer forest in Macon County, N.C. Litter and organic layer sub
strates were removed, composited and redistributed among plots within the b
locks (except for control plots). Seedlings of northern red oak (Quercus ru
bra) and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) were planted in the plots and h
arvested at the end of the first and second growing seasons. Litter manipul
ation had no effect on total mycorrhizal colonization, but the distribution
of Cenococcum geophilum mycorrhizae was altered. After the first year, per
cent mycorrhizal colonization of hemlocks not in Rm thickets (62%) was at l
east three times higher than in Rm thickets (19%), and the ramification ind
ex (no. of mycorrhizae cm(-1)) had increased by more than a factor of four
(2.83 versus 0.61). In addition, colonization of 1-year-old hemlocks by C.
geophilum was significantly higher within blocks with (10.4%) than without
(4.6%) Rm. Differences in mycorrhizal colonization, ramification indices an
d colonization by C. geophilum were absent or less pronounced on 2-year-old
hemlocks and 1- and 2-year-old oak seedlings. The biomasses of first year
oak roots and shoots and second year shoots were 50% less in Rm thickets. B
iomasses of first year hemlock roots and second year shoots were also reduc
ed. Mycorrhizal parameters were correlated with some growth parameters only
for hemlock seedlings, but did not explain most of the variation observed.