Phytochrome A (phyA) and phytochrome B (phyB) share the control of many pro
cesses but little is known about mutual signaling regulation. Here, we repo
rt on the interactions between phyA and phyB in the control of the activity
of an Lhcb1*2 gene fused to a reporter, hypocotyl growth and cotyledon unf
olding in etiolated Arabidopsis thaliana. The very-low fluence responses (V
LFR) induced by pulsed far-red light and the high-irradiance responses (HIR
) observed under continuous far-red light were absent in the phyA and phyA
phyB mutants, normal in the phyB mutant, and reduced in the fhy1 mutant tha
t is defective in phyA signaling. VLFR were also impaired in Columbia compa
red to Landsberg erecta. The low-fluence responses (LFR) induced by red-lig
ht pulses and reversed by subsequent far-red light pulses were small in the
wild type, absent in phyB and phyA phyB mutants but strong in the phyA and
fhy1 mutants. This indicates a negative effect of phyA and FHY1 on phyB-me
diated responses. However, a pre-treatment with continuous far-red light en
hanced the LFR induced by a subsequent red-light pulse. This enhancement wa
s absent in phyA, phyB, or phyA phyB and partial in fhy1. The levels of phy
B were not affected by the phyA or fhy1 mutations or by far-red light pre-t
reatments. We conclude that phyA acting in the VLFR mode (i.e. under light
pulses) is antagonistic to phyB signaling whereas phyA acting in the HIR mo
de (i.e. under continuous far-red light) operates synergistically with phyB
signaling, and that both types of interaction require FHY1.