Objective: The purpose of this study was to ascertain the ease of interpret
ation and usefulness of different modes of presenting quantitative tooth we
ar data to clinicians. Method and Materials: A questionnaire that sought to
ascertain both the ease of interpretation and usefulness of different mode
s of presentation for monitoring tooth wear was distributed to 67 clinician
s. These modes (contour maps, surface topography and difference plots, and
color-coded surface difference plots) were a product of ongoing development
that used a mathematic algorithm to defect and quantify wear of teeth with
time. A follow-up questionnaire, based on a fusion of the desirable featur
es of surface topography and color-coded surface difference plots was distr
ibuted to 40 of the original respondents to ascertain any improvement in cl
arity. Results: In all respects, contour maps were rated significantly more
difficult to interpret and less useful than the other techniques evaluated
. No significant difference was detected between the other modalities. The
follow-up questionnaire demonstrated a significantly enhanced utility of th
e revised plot in informing the clinician as to the worn sites and quantify
of wear. Conclusion: The combined mode of presentation seems an excellent
way of presenting wear results to clinicians for clinical application.