In this paper we theorize the impact of democratic stales on state-oriented
challengers. We argue that aspects of states influence the overall mobiliz
ation of state-oriented challengers and the forms of their mobilization and
collective action. We develop 12 hypotheses about the impact of stale poli
tical institutions, democratic processes, bureaucracies, and policies on mo
bilization and provide illustrative evidence for each from studies of socia
l movements. We also discuss the implications of the hypotheses for U.S. so
cial movements. One key implication is that the U.S, stale, comparatively s
peaking, has discouraged and continues to discourage social mobilization. A
nother is that the U.S. state has important systematic influences on forms
of mobilization and collective action.