Dyspnea, which has been defined as an "umcomfortable awareness of breathing
," is a frequent and devastating symptom in advanced cancer patients. It ha
s been reported to occur in 21-79% of patients evaluated a few days or week
s before death. In advanced cancer, the aim of effective management is to m
inimize the patient's perception of breathlessness, which depends in turn o
n a reliable assessment. Unfortunately, most of our knowledge and experienc
e of dyspnea has been acquired through working with patients with chronic p
ulmonary disease, and there is a dearth of literature relating specifically
to the assessment of dyspnea in advanced cancer. Dyspnea is a complex sens
ation including several dimensions, such as antecedents (physiological and
psychological events or stimuli preceding the development of dyspnea), medi
ators (characteristics of individuals or their environment affecting the re
sponse), reactions to dyspnea, and consequences or outcomes that result onc
e the individual has reacted to a stimulus. The literature gives us many to
ols to measure these aspects. For example, antecedents may be assessed by t
he British Medical Research Council Questionnaire, the American Thoracic Qu
estionnaire (ATS-DLD-78) and the Dyspnea Interview Schedule. Mediators of d
yspnea may be measured by the ATS-DLD-78, the Chronic Respiratory Questionn
aire (CRQ), the Dyspnea Interview Schedule, the Pulmonary Functional Status
Scale (PFSS) and the Therapy Impact Questionnaire (TIQ). Reactions to dysp
nea may be assessed by the Dyspnea Visual Analogue Scale (DVAS), the TIQ an
d the Borg Scale, and the consequences of it by the TIQ, the Baseline Dyspn
ea Index (BDI), the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), and CRQ, and by the Oxy
gen Cost Diagram (OCD), the Dyspnea Interview Schedule and the Modified Med
ical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MRC). No single assessment tool consid
ers all the different components of dyspnea,and the final choice will depen
d on the purpose of the assessment, taking into account that the provision
of quality of life is of paramount importance to patients who have limited
time left to them and that the assessment should not therefore detract from
the quality of life by being overlong, complicated or invasive.