Jc. Bestall et al., Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, THORAX, 54(7), 1999, pp. 581-586
Background-Methods of classifying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CO
PD) depend largely upon spirometric measurements but disability is only wea
kly related to measurements of lung function. With the increased use of pul
monary rehabilitation, a need has been identified for a simple and standard
ised method of categorising disability in COPD. This study examined the val
idity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale for this purpose
.
Methods-One hundred patients with COPD were recruited from an outpatient pu
lmonary rehabilitation programme. Assessments included the MRC dyspnoea sca
le, spirometric tests, blood gas tensions, a shuttle walking test, and Borg
scores for perceived breathlessness before and after exercise. Health stat
us was assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and
Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). The Nottingham Extended Activities
of Daily Living (EADL) score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) sco
re were also measured.
Results-Of the patients studied, 32 were classified as having MRC grade 3 d
yspnoea, 34 MRC grade 4 dyspnoea, and 34 MRC grade 5 dyspnoea. Patients wit
h MRC grades 1 and 2 dyspnoea were not included in the study. There was a s
ignificant association between MRC grade and shuttle distance, SGRQ and CRQ
scores, mood state and EADL. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)
was not associated with MRC grade. Multiple logistic regression showed tha
t the determinants of disability appeared to vary with the level of disabil
ity. Between MRC grades 3 and 4 the significant covariates were exercise pe
rformance, SGRQ and depression score, whilst between grades 4 and 5 exercis
e performance and age were the major determinants.
Conclusions-The MRC dyspnoea scale is a simple and valid method of categori
sing patients with COPD in terms of their disability that could be used to
complement FEV1 in the classification of COPD severity.