A model for the dual drainage system in a flat 20 hectare slum in Indore, I
ndia was developed to evaluate the factors which influence drainage perform
ance. Performance was defined by the depth, extent, duration, and frequency
of flooding during the 1994 monsoon. This paper reports on the conceptual
problem of model validation, particularly for "flooding" or "not flooding".
The model's predictions for maximum depth during verification were reasona
ble, as 72% of maximum depth predictions were within +/- 0.10 m of observed
values. The predictions for the binary variable of flooding at a point wer
e, however, poor. The model gave good predictions of freeboard violation, w
here the freeboard level was set at 50 mm below the lowest kerb. The paper
offers some intuitive reasons as to why prediction of freeboard violation m
ay be expected to be better than prediction of flooding. The authors conclu
de that where models cannot be validated for flooding prediction, it may be
better to redefine performance criteria and validate the model for freeboa
rd violation. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of the I
AWQ. All rights reserved.