Attributions for events with information varying on level of causality and
context (relationship, achievement) were examined in young, middle-aged, an
d older adults. Participants rated the degree to which the causes of an eve
nt were a function of three dispositional dimensions of the primary charact
er, two dimensions of situational factors, and a combination of these. They
also wrote essays justifying their ratings. Older and younger adults made
more dispositional attributions than middle-aged adults did in relationship
situations. Younger and middle-aged adults were more relativistic in their
causal attributions than older adults. Relative proportions of disposition
al justifications correlated with quantitative dispositional ratings, but o
nly for relationship situations (suggesting strong domain-specific influenc
es on attributional judgments). Clusters of individuals differing in patter
ns of attributional justifications were identified. Cluster groups showed s
alient differences in dispositional ratings and dialectical reasoning. Find
ings are discussed in terms of how beliefs and values individuals hold abou
t situations influence attributional judgments.