Bh. Nguyen et al., Physiologic identification of eighth nerve subdivisions: Direct recordingswith bipolar and monopolar electrodes, AM J OTOL, 20(4), 1999, pp. 522-534
The purpose of this study was to determine stimulation and recording parame
ters that maximize differences in evoked responses recorded between the coc
hlear nerve and the surrounding tissues. Click-evoked potentials were obtai
ned using monopolar and bipolar recording electrodes placed directly on the
exposed eighth nerve of anesthetized cats. Responses were compared as stim
ulus intensity, electrode location, and bipolar electrode orientation and i
nterelectrode spacing were systematically varied. Wave amplitudes increased
monotonically with intensity for both monopolar and bipolar configurations
, but bipolar configurations exhibited greater selectivity in differentiati
ng cochlear from vestibular subdivisions. The optimal stimulus intensity wa
s 70 to 80 dB peak sound pressure level (pSPL). Monopolar recordings were o
ften confounded by activity originating at remote sites, typically the coch
lear nucleus and (for recording sites on the vestibular nerve) the cochlear
nerve. Bipolar response amplitudes increased with interelectrode spacing a
nd were largest when electrodes were oriented parallel to the long axis of
the nerve. Extrapolation of empirical data indicated that amplitudes of bip
olar responses would be maximal at an electrode separation of 7.5 mm. Cochl
ear nerve conduction velocity, calculated from wave latencies at each of th
e two monopolar electrodes, was 11.6 +/- 1.6 m/sec.