Dj. Hearse et Fj. Sutherland, Catecholamines and preconditioning: studies of contraction and function inisolated rat hearts, AM J P-HEAR, 46(1), 1999, pp. H136-H143
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY
The aims of this study were to determine whether 1) like ischemic precondit
ioning, transient exposure to norepinephrine before ischemia exacerbates co
ntracture during ischemia and 2) protection afforded by norepinephrine is s
tereospecific (receptor mediated). Isolated perfused rat hearts were random
ized into five groups (n = 6/group): 1) ischemic preconditioning (3 min of
ischemia +3 min of reperfusion +5 min of ischemia +5 min of reperfusion), 2
) untreated control, 3) vehicle control (ascorbic acid), 4) substitution of
preconditioning ischemia by perfusion with d-norepinephrine, and 5) substi
tution of preconditioning ischemia by perfusion with l-norepinephrine. This
was followed by 40 min of zero-flow ischemia and 50 min of reperfusion. Is
chemic preconditioning and l-norepinephrine exacerbated contracture (time t
o 50% contracture = 9.2 +/- 1.1 and 9.0 +/- 1.1 vs. 13.3 +/- 0.3, 12.4 +/-
0.5, and 13.2 +/- 0.4 min for untreated control, vehicle control, and d-nor
epinephrine, respectively, P < 0.05). Postischemic left ventricular develop
ed pressure was poor in untreated control (23.0 +/- 2.2%), vehicle control
(26.9 +/- 2.3%), and d-norepinephrine (19.8 +/- 2.8%) groups but good in pr
econditioned (52.4 +/- 5.1%) and l-norepinephrine (52.5 +/- 1.1%) groups (P
< 0.05). Thus norepinephrine preconditioning, like ischemic preconditionin
g, causes a paradoxical exacerbation of contracture coupled with enhanced p
ostischemic recovery; both effects are stereospecific.