In 1818 Laplace proposed that the Academie des Sciences in Paris set up a p
rize to be awarded to whoever succeeded in constructing lunar tables based
solely on the law of universal gravity. In 1820 the prize was awarded to Ca
rlini and Plana and Damoiseau by a committee of which Laplace was a member.
But Laplace strongly criticized the Carlini-Plana approach to the lunar th
eory. A dispute ensued that is reconstructed on the basis of hitherto unkno
wn letters exchanged between Carlini-Plana and Laplace, and on the basis of
papers published in Connaissance des temps and in Zach's Correspondance. A
fter the exchanges, public and private, between Carlini-Plana and Laplace,
the latter concluded that the results of the Italian astronomers and those
arrived at by Damoiseau following the method of his Mecanique Celeste were
fairly close, and that the purpose of the Academie in establishing the priz
e had been reasonably fulfilled.