Temporal trends in the use of anticoagulants among older adults with atrial fibrillation

Citation
Nl. Smith et al., Temporal trends in the use of anticoagulants among older adults with atrial fibrillation, ARCH IN MED, 159(14), 1999, pp. 1574-1578
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00039926 → ACNP
Volume
159
Issue
14
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1574 - 1578
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9926(19990726)159:14<1574:TTITUO>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background: Several recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated tha t warfarin sodium treatment, and to a lesser extent aspirin, reduces risk o f stroke and death compared with placebo in persons with atrial fibrillatio n. Insufficient documentation exists on the extent to which the use of thes e therapies following trial publications has continued to increase in the e lderly with atrial fibrillation. Methods: We used data from the Cardiovascular Health Study, a study of 5888 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older, to determine the prevale nce of warfarin and aspirin use in persons with electrocardiogram-identifie d atrial fibrillation. Electrocardiogram examinations were conducted at bas eline from 1989 through 1990, and at 6 subsequent annual examinations throu gh 1995-1996. Medication data were collected by inventory methods at each e xamination. Temporal change in use of anticoagulants was analyzed by compar ing percentage use in 1990 to use in each year through 1996. Results: The use of warfarin increased 4-fold from 13% in 1990 to 50% in 19 96 among participants with prevalent atrial fibrillation (P < .001). Daily use of aspirin did not increase over time. Participants younger than 80 yea rs were 4 times more likely to use warfarin in 1996 (P < .001) than those 8 0 years and older. Use of aspirin did not vary significantly with age. Conclusions: Warfarin use in community-dwelling elderly persons with electr ocardiogram-documented atrial fibrillation increased steadily following the first publication of its treatment benefit, reaching 50% by 1996. In contr ast, use of aspirin was unchanged during this same period. Continued effort s to promote appropriate antil coagulation therapy to physicians and their patients may still be needed.