Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment management
strategies for children older than 3 years who present with signs or sympt
oms of pharyngitis.
Design: Decision model with 7 strategies, including neither testing for str
eptococcus nor treating with antibiotics; treating empirically with penicil
lin V; basing treatment on results of a throat culture (Culture); and basin
g treatment on results of enzyme immunoassay or optical immunoassay rapid t
ests, performed alone or in combination with throat cultures. In these 7 st
rategies, all tests are performed in a local reference laboratory. In a sen
sitivity analysis, we examined the cost-effectiveness of 4 strategies invol
ving office-based testing. We obtained data on event probabilities and test
characteristics from our hospital's clinical laboratory and the literature
; costs for the analysis were based on resource use.
Results: At a baseline prevalence of 20.8% for streptococcal pharyngitis, t
he Culture strategy was the least expensive and most effective, with an ave
rage cost of $6.85 per patient. The outcome was sensitive to the prevalence
of streptococcal pharyngitis, the rheumatic fever attack rate, the cost of
the enzyme immunoassay test, and the cost of culturing and reporting cultu
re results. The Culture strategy was also preferred if amoxicillin was subs
tituted for oral penicillin. For office-based testing, Culture was the leas
t costly strategy, but treatment based on results of the optical immunoassa
y test alone had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1.6 million pe
r additional life saved.
Conclusion: In a setting with adherent patients, children with sore throats
should generally get throat cultures in lieu of rapid streptococcus antige
n tests.