Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation infirst traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder
A. Kirkley et al., Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation infirst traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder, ARTHROSCOPY, 15(5), 1999, pp. 507-514
Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness of traditional treatment with
immediate arthroscopic stabilization in young patients who have sustained a
first traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Forty skeletally mat
ure patients younger than 30 years of age were randomly allocated to immobi
lization for 3 weeks followed by rehabilitation (group T) or arthroscopic s
tabilization (within 4 weeks of injury) followed by an identical immobiliza
tion and rehabilitation protocol (group S). A blinded research assistant pe
rformed all follow-up evaluations. The dominant arm was involved in 35% of
subjects. The injury occurred in a sporting event in 70% of subjects. At 24
months, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of re
dislocation (T = 47%, S = 15.9%, P = .03). An intention-to-treat analysis c
omparing disease-specific quality of life using the validated Western Ontar
io Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index showed statistically significantly bet
ter results in the surgically treated group at the 33 months (T = 633.93 v
S = 287.1, P = .03) and no significant difference in range of motion. At an
average 32 months follow-up, a significant reduction in redislocation and
improvement in disease-specific quality of life is afforded by early arthro
scopic stabilization in patients less than 30 year of age with a first, tra
umatic, anterior dislocation of the shoulder.