P. Finelli et al., Detection of t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) chromosomal translocation in multiple myeloma by double-color fluorescent in situ hybridization, BLOOD, 94(2), 1999, pp. 724-732
Chromosomal translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) l
ocus at chromosome 14q32 represent a common mechanism of oncogene activatio
n in lymphoid malignancies. In multiple myeloma (MM), variable chromosome p
artners have been identified by conventional cytogenetics, including the 11
q13, 8q24, 18q21, and 6p21 loci. We and others have recently reported a nov
el, karyotypically undetectable chromosomal translocation t(4;14)(p16.3;q32
) in MM-derived cell lines, as well as in primary tumors. The 4p16.3 breakp
oints are relatively scattered and located less than 100 kb centromeric of
the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene or within the recently
identified WHSC1 gene, both of which are apparently deregulated by the tra
nslocation. To assess the frequency of the t(4; 14)(p16.3; q32) translocati
on in MM, we performed a double-color fluorescent in situ hybridization (FI
SH) analysis of interphase nuclei with differently labeled probes specific
for the IGH locus (a pool of plasmid clones specific for the IGH constant r
egions) or 4p16.3 (yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) 764-H1 spanning the re
gion involved in breakpoints). Thirty MM patients, the MM-derived cell line
s KMS-11 and OPM2, and six normal controls were examined, The identificatio
n of a t(4:14) translocation, evaluated as the presence of a der(14) chromo
some, was based on the colocalization of signals specific for the two probe
s; a cutoff value of 15% (mean + 3 standard deviation [SD]) derived from th
e interphase FISH of the normal controls (range, 5% to 11%; mean +/- SD, 8.
16 +/- 2,2) was used for the quantification analysis. In interphase FISH, f
ive patients (one in clinical stage I, two in stage II, one in stage III, a
nd a plasma cell leukemia) were found to be positive (approximate to 15%).
FISH metaphases with split or colocalized signals were detected in only two
of the translocated cases and confirmed the pattern found in the interphas
e nuclei. Furthermore, in three of the five cases with the translocation, F
ISH analysis with the IGH joining probe (JH) showed the presence of the rec
iprocal product of the translocation [der(4) chromosome]. Overall, our stud
y indicates that the t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) chromosomal translocation is a recu
rrent event in MM tumors and may contribute towards the detection of this l
esion and our understanding of its pathogenetic and clinical implications i
n MM. (C) 1999 by The American Society of Hematology.