A turning point in the surgical history of the open tibial fractures: osteosynthesis associated with immediate cover in the most serious injuries of the soft tissues
P. Vichard et al., A turning point in the surgical history of the open tibial fractures: osteosynthesis associated with immediate cover in the most serious injuries of the soft tissues, B ACA N MED, 183(3), 1999, pp. 569-588
A brief history of the treatment of open leg fractures (OLF) points out the
problems posed by the present therapy with regard to the soft tissues in t
he most serious cases (type III from cauchoix, Duparc, type III A and B fro
m Gustilo). Which strategy should be foremost, knowing that the debridement
, stabilization and cover are the three essential procedures? Rigourous deb
ridement certainly carries unanimous approval but some are opposed to this
procedure during the first few days Also widely recognized is the beneficia
l aspect of early cover when regarding aseptic evolution, consolidation, lo
w rate of complications, rehabilitation and the patient's helplessness. How
ever: despite the well demonstrated results of BYRD [14] and GODINA [15] an
d because of the debridement concept and logistical insufficiencies, thorou
gh treatment in a true emergency has not achieved full acceptance. In gener
al, the majority of surgeons first clear, stabilize with the use of an exte
rnal fixator in true emergency situations and cover several days later. For
the past ten years, in real emergencies, in the Department of Orthopedics
Traumatology and Plastic Surgery at the Besancon University Hospital Center
we have subscribed to a radical treatment which simultaneously combines de
bridement, osteosynthesis (locked centro-medullary nailing) and cover with
the use of free flaps in the same operating period. A study based on 27 wou
nded patients seeks to validate the advantages of looked centro-medullary n
ailing over the use of an external fixator and the use of free flaps rather
than local flaps in the most serious cases.