F. Hata et al., Identification of segments VI and VII of the liver based on the ramification patterns of the intrahepatic portal and hepatic veins, CLIN ANAT, 12(4), 1999, pp. 229-244
We describe the pattern of intrahepatic vessel ramification in the right po
sterior hepatic sector in a population of 197 adults. Each specimen was dis
sected from its visceral (inferior) surface in order to demonstrate variati
ons in the distribution of the portal vein branches to the hepatic segments
of the right lobe, especially to segments VI (S6) and VII (S7) as describe
d by Couinaud. We also examine whether three hepatic veins, i.e.. the right
hepatic vein (RHV), middle hepatic vein (MHV), and the short hepatic vein
(SHV), aid the identification of segmental portal branches in the lower pos
terior sector. Four major patterns of branching of the posterior sectorial
trunk of the portal vein system are described. In group A (32.0%) a single
posterior trunk formed an arch-like pattern sending multiple branches to S6
and S7 (P6 and P7). We named the multiple branches to the apparent S6 the
inferoposterior portal branches. It was difficult to identify which of thes
e branches were equivalent to P6. In group B (27.9%), the posterior sectori
al trunk bifurcated to form P6 and P7. In most of the specimens in this gro
up, therefore, we were able clearly to identify both S6 and S7 based on the
portal vein system. In group C (6.6%), the trunk trifurcated to form P6, P
7, and an intermediate branch, which supplied both segments or a gray zone
between them. Group D (33.5%) included variations of the anterior segmental
branches, and in specimens of this group, the anteromedial border of the s
ector was difficult to identify. Notably, the three-dimensional interdigita
ting topographical relationship of the hepatic veins and the portal branche
s was not evident in the lower posterior sector, since tributaries of the R
HV and the portal branches followed similar courses and paralleled each oth
er in the region and since the territory of the SHV was usually restricted
to the superficial parenchyma near the inferior surface, In group A, tribut
aries of the RHV/SHV (>3 mm in diameter) passed between the inferoposterior
portal branches in only 22.2%/14.3% of the specimens. Thus the hepatic vei
ns often did not reveal which of the multiple inferoposterior branches was
P6. Moreover, in the subset of Group B in which the segments were identifie
d based on the portal vein ramification, tributaries of the RHV/SHV (>3 mm
in diameter) showed the intersegmental interdigitating arrangement in only
32.0%/6.0% of the specimens. In addition, a thick tributary of the MHV, som
etimes arising from S6, did not run along, but penetrated the S5/S6 border
plane from the lateral to the medial side. Therefore, the three hepatic vei
ns (RHV, SHV, MHV) often did not aid the identification of the liver segmen
ts in the region. Consequently, the less than ideal combinations of irregul
ar configurations of the portal and hepatic venous systems suggest that the
right posterior segments cannot be conclusively identified anatomically in
30-40% of cases. Other means of identification, such as the conventional p
roportional manner (the upper and lower halves of the posterior sector roug
hly correspond to S6 and S7) may be required. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.