Lack of relationship between eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil protein X in nasal lavage and urine and the severity of childhood asthma in a6-month follow-up study

Citation
C. Wojnarowski et al., Lack of relationship between eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil protein X in nasal lavage and urine and the severity of childhood asthma in a6-month follow-up study, CLIN EXP AL, 29(7), 1999, pp. 926-932
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY
ISSN journal
09547894 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
926 - 932
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-7894(199907)29:7<926:LORBEC>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Background Recent studies suggest that eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) an d eosinophil protein X (EPX) may be valuable markers of airway inflammation in various body fluids of asthmatic children. Most of these studies have r elied on a single measure of inflammatory markers. Objective We measured ECP and EPX in nasal lavage fluids (NALF) and urine s amples in children with asthma over a 6-month period to study the relations hip between inflammatory markers and clinical severity. Methods Fourteen children with mild persisting asthma (mean age 11.7 years, so 2.2) were recruited. All patients were on therapy including inhaled ste roids. For a 6-month period asthma severity was monitored by at least month ly physical examination and pulmonary function tests. Daily morning and eve ning PEF, asthma symptoms and medication were recorded in diaries for the w hole study period. Telephone interviews were performed between visits and a dditional visits were done in case of an increase in asthmatic symptoms or drop of PEF values under 80% of best value. An exacerbation was defined by a fall of FEV1 > 10% and an increase in asthma symptoms and additional need of beta(2)-agonist. NALF and urine samples were obtained at each visit and analysed for ECP (NALF only) and EPX. Results Mean observation time was 186.3 days (SD 19.8). Thirteen patients c ompleted the study. During the study period 11 exacerbations were observed in six patients. No significant associations between PEF, PEF variability ( amplitude % of mean), daily symptoms, additional beta(2)-agonist, FEV1 and MEF50 and nasal ECP, nasal EPX and urinary EPX were found. However, at exac erbations an average increase of nasal ECP (9.3 vs 50.3 mu g/L) and EPX (na sal EPX 36.4 vs 141.7 mu g/L, urinary EPX 46.4 vs 74.1 mu g/mmol creatinine ) was observed. Conclusion Serial measurements of ECP and EPX in NALF and urine samples do not provide additional information for the practical management in monitori ng childhood asthma.