PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of la
paroscopic abdominoperineal resection and open abdominoperineal resection f
or cancer. METHODS: Records of 194 patients who underwent laparoscopic abdo
minoperineal resection (42 patients) or open abdominoperineal resection (15
2 patients) at three institutions betw een 1991 and 1997 were reviewed. Fol
low-up was through office charts, American College of Surgeons cancer regis
try, or telephone contact. Tumors included (laparoscopic abdominoperineal r
esection and open abdominoperineal resection, respectively) adenocarcinoma
(86 and 92 percent), squamous (12 and7 percent), and gastrointestinal strom
al (2 and 1.4 percent) types; Stages I (17 and 26 percent), II (24 and 33 p
ercent), III (43 and 32 percent), and IV (14 and 9 percent); and those with
invasion of pelvic structures (14 and 16 percent). RESULTS: Laparoscopic a
bdominoperineal resection was converted to open abdominoperineal resection
in 21 percent because of vessel injury (33 percent), poor exposure (22 perc
ent), adhesions (22 percent), inguinal hernia (11 percent), or radiation fi
brosis (11 percent). Perineal infections occurred more often in the laparos
copic abdominoperineal resection group (24 vs. 8 percent; P = 0.02). Late s
toma complications were similar. Mean hospital stay was shorter after lapar
oscopic abdominoperineal resection (7 vs. 12 days). Radial margins were pos
itive in 12 percent of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and 12.5 per
cent of open abdominoperineal resection specimens. Tumor recurrence was sim
ilar for both local (19 and 14 percent) and distant (38 and 26 percent) rec
urrence. Survival rates were similar by Kaplan-Meier curves, with median fo
llow-up of 19 and 24 months, respectively (P = 0.22; log rank). CONCLUSION:
Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection can be performed safely and result
s in a shorter hospital stay. A randomized, prospective trial is needed to
determine the long-term outcome of cancer treatment.