The present study explored gender differences in answers to constructed-res
ponse mathematics items. Features relevant and irrelevant to the scoring ru
bric but possibly related to gender differences were identified by a conten
t expert after a review of the literature. Raters were trained to score the
identified features for approximately 500 papers evenly divided across two
grade levels and between genders. The papers rated for these features had
holistic scores assigned by local teachers using a state-provided rubric. T
he relationship between these holistic scores, studied features, objective
scores, and gender differences was explored through standardized mean diffe
rences, correlations, and covariance analyses. The results indicate that ru
bric-relevant variables were highly predictive of holistic scores and accou
nted for some of the gender differences. especially at seventh grade. Howev
er, the possibly rubric-irrelevant feature of number of words written was s
tatistically significant even when the rubric-relevant features were contro
lled.