M. Ledeboer et al., Antroduodenal motility and small bowel transit during continuous intraduodenal or intragastric administration of enteral nutrition, EUR J CL IN, 29(7), 1999, pp. 615-623
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background Gastrointestinal intolerance is observed more frequently during
intraduodenal (ID) tube feeding than during intragastric (IG) feeding, poss
ibly because it evokes a stronger gastrointestinal response and accelerates
small bowel transit. We have investigated whether the accelerated small bo
wel transit during ID feeding results from alterations in antroduodenal mot
ility pattern.
Design The effect of IG and ID infusion of a polymeric diet (Nutrison, 125
kcal h(-1)) on antroduodenal motility, small bowel transit time (SBTT) and
gastrointestinal hormone release was studied in nine healthy subjects. Thes
e subjects were studied on three occasions for 6h during fasting, continuou
s IG or ID feeding.
Results Phase III recurrence time was significantly prolonged during IG fee
ding compared with fasting (240 +/- 51 vs. 136 +/- 24 min; P < 0.05). None
of the subjects had recurrence of phase III during ID feeding; the fed moto
r pattern remained present. Parameters of fed motility (mean amplitude and
motility index) were not significantly different between IG and ID feeding,
although the frequency of antral and duodenal contractions was lower durin
g ID than during IG feeding. SBTT was significantly accelerated during ID c
ompared with IG feeding and with fasting (58 +/- 8 vs, 73 +/- 9 and 83 +/-
10 min respectively; P < 0.05). Plasma cholecystokinin (CCK) and pancreatic
polypeptide (PP) levels were significantly higher during ID than during IG
feeding. Peptide YY (PYY) levels were significantly higher during ID than
during fasting, but not during IG feeding
Conclusions During intraduodenal feeding, a fed motility pattern is preserv
ed, whereas during intragastric feeding transition from a fed to a fasting
motor pattern is observed in over 50% of the subjects. These differences ma
y be related to augmented hormone release during intraduodenal feeding.