Purpose To examine post-operative visual outcomes when using micro-incision
surgery and a three-piece, foldable acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) and whe
n using small-incision surgery and a one-piece, rigid polymethylmethacrylat
e (PMMA) IOL,.
Methods Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation was conducted by one surge
on on 86 subjects (aged 50-89 years) with cataracts. Of these subjects, 67
completed the study. Subjects were implanted either with a foldable IOL (n
= 38) or a rigid IOL (n = 29), Best corrected Snellen visual acuity and con
trast sensitivity (2-28 cycles/degree) were measured approximately 2 months
postoperatively. Comparisons were made between the pseudophakic groups and
an additional group of 28 age-matched, normal subjects (aged 58-81 years).
Non-parametric (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U) as well as parametric (
ANOVA and Pearson) statistics tests were used in the analysis of results.
Results All pseudophakes had corrected visual acuity of 6/9 or better. Ther
e were no significant differences in visual acuity (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.6
1) or contrast sensitivity (ANOVA, p = 0.33) between the three groups. The
mean residual refractive error of the foldable IOL group was hypermetropic
in comparison with the rigid IOL group but not significant at the 99% level
of probability (Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.02). There was no significant differ
ence in astigmatism between the groups.
Conclusions Implanting a foldable acrylic IOL gave no post-operative benefi
t in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity to pseudophakes over a less exp
ensive rigid PMMA IOL, within this post-operative period. This study did no
t provide a comparison between the two lenses regarding post-operative comp
lications, in particular the important long-term complication of posterior
capsular opacification (PCO). Until and if any particular advantage of a gi
ven IOL in reduced incidence of PCO is confirmed, it appears more economica
l to implant the conventional rigid PMMA IOL using small-incision surgery.