CFIRP: What we learned in the first ten years

Citation
Cl. Chambers et al., CFIRP: What we learned in the first ten years, FOREST CHRO, 75(3), 1999, pp. 431-434
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
FORESTRY CHRONICLE
ISSN journal
00157546 → ACNP
Volume
75
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
431 - 434
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-7546(199905/06)75:3<431:CWWLIT>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
In response to public dissatisfaction with forest management methods, we in itiated the College of Forestry Integrated Research Project (CFIRP) to test alternative silvicultural systems in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) s tands in western Oregon. We compared costs and biological acid human respon ses among a control and three replicated silvicultural alternatives to clea rcutting that retained structural features found in old Douglas-fir forests . Treatments were applied within 8- to 15-ha stands and attempted to mimic crown fires (modified clearcut), windthrow (green tree retention), and smal l-scale impacts such as root rot diseases (small patch group selection). We also compared costs in three unreplicated treatments (large patch group se lection, wedge cut, and strip cut). Each treatment included differences in the pattern of retained dead trees (snags), as either scattered individuals or as clumps. Good communication among researchers and managers, a long-te rm commitment to the project, and careful documentation of research sites a nd data are important to the success of longterm silvicultural research pro jects. To date, over 30 publications have resulted from the project.