Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy: Classification, indication and procedures
Citation
H. Nagai et al., Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy: Classification, indication and procedures, HEP-GASTRO, 46(27), 1999, pp. 1953-1958
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology","da verificare
Journal title
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY
SICI code
0172-6390(199905/06)46:27<1953:PDCIAP>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent advances in the surgical anatomy of the pancreatodu
odenal region have permitted duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection.
However, pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) has not been systematically s
tudied and various types of such procedures have been reported under the de
signation of PSD.
METHODOLOGY: PSD was performed in 6 patients with extensive duodenal lesion
s including trauma, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, corr
osive necrosis, bleeding, leiomyosarcoma and congenital stenosis. Three pat
ients had the whole papilla Vateri and half of the duodenum preserved and a
nastomosed to the jejunum. One patient had the duodenal button including th
e papilla of Vater transplanted to the jejunum. Another patient had the int
raduodenal portion of the major papilla excised and the terminal portion of
the bile and pancreatic ducts anastomosed to the jejunum.
RESULTS: Two patients with moribund conditions died of the underlying disor
ders 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery, respectively, but without leakage
or other surgery-associated complications. The other 4 patients survived th
e surgery without anastomotic insufficiency. Three survivors, who had compl
ete preservation of the major and minor papillae along with the half portio
n of the duodenum, had normal morphology and function of the biliopancreati
c system post-operatively. The fourth survivor, that with excision of the i
ntrapancreatic portion of the major papilla, had regurgitation of contrast
material into the bile and pancreatic ducts 2 months after surgery on activ
e insufflation of the intestinal lumen, but remained asymptomatic. No abnor
mality in liver and pancreatic function was detected as of 7 months post-op
eratively.
CONCLUSIONS: PSD appears to be applicable in the clinical setting, although
classification of the procedure seems mandatory in consideration of indica
tions, techniques, and long-term consequences of biliopancreatic function.