Differences in whole body measurements by DXA-scanning using two Lunar DPX-L machines

Citation
H. Lantz et al., Differences in whole body measurements by DXA-scanning using two Lunar DPX-L machines, INT J OBES, 23(7), 1999, pp. 764-770
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
ISSN journal
03070565 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
764 - 770
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-0565(199907)23:7<764:DIWBMB>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare bone mineral and body composition results of two dual -energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) instruments from the same manufacturer. SETTINGS: The Medical departments of Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteb org and University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. DESIGN: Unique aluminium spine phantoms (Phant A and B) delivered with each DXA machine (DXA-A and DXA-B) were cross-checked on the other machine by u sing the 'AP spine mode'. Eight adolescents were examined on both instrumen ts within 5 h to ascertain total body variables by using standard, as well as extended, modes of analysis. All these double-examinations were undertak en on two occasions, before and after exchange of a detector on the DXA-B, SUBJECTS: Four males and four females aged 15.4-19.2y with normal body weig hts, were examined on both occasions. On each occasion, the first examinati on was performed in Goteborg on four individuals and in Uppsala on four ind ividuals. RESULTS: On the first occasion the phantom measurements resulted in much lo wer bone mineral density (BMD) values on the DXA-B than on the DXA-A. Later it was detected that a so-called R-value and the corresponding '%-fat' val ue were out of range on the DXA-B. After exchange of detector, the differen ce in phantom BMD-values between the two machines had diminished. On the fi rst occasion in vivo BMD values were lowest on the DXA-B (P < 0.01), while on the second occasion they were significantly lower on the DXA-A (P < 0.05 ). Soft tissue differences were greater after detector exchange and as comp ared to DXA-A, DXA-B underestimated body fat by 3.5 kg (13.2 vs 9.7 kg, Pt 0.001) and overestimated lean tissue mass by 3.8 kg (47.1 vs 50.9 kg, P < 0 .001) on the second occasion. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in results between two apparently identical Lu nar DPX-L machines were not acceptable. In multicenter studies, it may be n ecessary to standardise results of participating machines into results of o ne machine by means of regression equations obtained by examining subsample s of individuals on one master machine and other participating instruments.