Primary coronary angioplasty vs thrombolysis for the management of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients

Citation
Ak. Berger et al., Primary coronary angioplasty vs thrombolysis for the management of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients, J AM MED A, 282(4), 1999, pp. 341-348
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
00987484 → ACNP
Volume
282
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
341 - 348
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(19990728)282:4<341:PCAVTF>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Context Despite evidence from randomized trials that, compared with early t hrombolysis, primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reduces mortality in middle-aged ad ults, whether elderly patients with AMI are more likely to benefit from PTC A or early thrombolysis is not known. Objective To determine survival after primary PTCA vs thrombolysis in elder ly patients, Design The Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, a retrospective cohort study using data from medical charts and administrative files. Setting Acute care hospitals in the United States. Patients A total of 20 683 Medicare beneficiaries, who arrived within 12 ho urs of the onset of symptoms, were admitted between January 1994 and Februa ry 1996 with a principal discharge diagnosis of AMI, and were eligible for reperfusion therapy. Main Outcome Measures Thirty-day and 1-year survival. Results A total of 80 356 eligible patients had an AMI at hospital arrival and met the inclusion criteria, of whom 23.2% received thrombolysis and 2.5 % underwent primary PTCA within 6 hours of hospital arrival, Patients under going primary PTCA had lower 30-day (8.7% vs 11.9%, P=.001) and 1-year mort ality (14.4% vs 17.6%, P=.001). After adjusting for baseline cardiac risk f actors and admission and hospital characteristics, primary PTCA was associa ted with improved 30-day (hazard ratio [HR] of death, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.88) and 1-year (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94) survival . The benefits of primary coronary angioplasty persisted when stratified by hospitals' AMI volume and the presence of on-site angiography. In patients classified as ideal for reperfusion therapy, the mortality benefit of prim ary PTCA was not significant at 1-year follow-up (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78-1. 08). Conclusion In elderly patients who present with AMI, primary PTCA is associ ated with modestly lower short- and long-term mortality rates, In the subgr oup of patients who were classified as ideal for reperfusion therapy, the o bserved benefit of primary PTCA was no longer significant.