Lm. Baldwin et al., Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank - Clinical privileges action reports, J AM MED A, 282(4), 1999, pp. 349-355
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Context The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) is believed to be an imp
ortant source of information for peer review activities by the majority of
those who use it. However, concern has been raised that hospitals may be un
derreporting physicians with performance problems to the NPDB.
Objective To examine variation in clinical privileges action reporting by h
ospitals to the NPDB, changes in reporting over time, and the association o
f hospital characteristics with reporting.
Design Retrospective cohort study of privileges action reports to the NPDB
between 1991 and 1995, linked with the 1992 and 1995 databases from the Ann
ual Survey of Hospitals conducted by the American Hospital Association.
Setting and Participants A total of 4743 short-term, nonfederal, general me
dical/surgical hospitals throughout the United States that were continuousl
y open between 1991-1995 and registered with the NPDB,
Main Outcome Measures (1) Reporting of 1 or more privileges actions during
the 5-year study period and (2) privileges action reporting rates (numbers
of actions reported per 100 000 admissions).
Results Study hospitals reported 3328 privileges actions between 1991 and 1
995; 34.2% reported 1 or more actions during the period. The range of privi
leges action reporting rates for these hospitals was 0.40 to 52.27 per 100
000 admissions, with an overall rate of 2.36 per 100 000 admissions. The pr
oportion of hospitals reporting an action decreased from 11.6% in 1991 to 1
0.0% in 1995 (P = .008), After adjustment for other factors, urban hospital
s had significantly higher reporting than rural hospitals (adjusted odds ra
tio [OR], 1.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.02-1.43]), while members of
the Council of Teaching Hospitals of the Association of American Medical C
olleges had significantly lower reporting than nonmembers (adjusted OR, 0.5
4 [95% CI, 0.40-0.73]). There were notable regional differences in reportin
g, with the east south Central region having the lowest rate per 100 000 ad
missions (1.49 [95% CI, 1.33-1.65]).
Conclusions The results of this study indicate a low and declining level of
hospital privileges action reporting to the NPDB. Several potential explan
ations exist, 1 of which is that the information reported to the NPDB is in
complete.