Kl. Nichol et al., Effectiveness of live, attenuated intranasal influenza virus vaccine in healthy, working adults - A randomized controlled trial, J AM MED A, 282(2), 1999, pp. 137-144
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Context Influenza virus is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily li
fe, and increased use of health care in ail age groups.
Objective To assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasally administer
ed trivalent, live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccine for reducing
illness, absenteeism, and health care use among healthy, working adults.
Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from Se
ptember 1997 through March 1998.
Setting Thirteen centers across the United States.
Participants A total of 4561 healthy, working adults aged 18 to 64 years re
cruited through health insurance plans, at work sites, and from the general
population.
Intervention Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intranasally admin
istered trivalent LAIV vaccine (n = 3041) or placebo (n = 1520) in the fall
of 1997.
Main Outcome Measures Episodes of febrile illness, severe febrile illness,
febrile upper respiratory tract illness, work loss, and health care use dur
ing the peak and total influenza outbreak periods, and adverse events.
Results Recipients of LAIV vaccine were as likely to experience 1 or more f
ebrile illnesses as placebo recipients during peak outbreak periods (13.2%
for vaccine vs 14.6% for placebo; P=.19). However, vaccination significantl
y reduced the numbers of severe febrile illnesses (18.8% reduction; 95% con
fidence interval [CI], 7.4%-28.8%) and febrile upper respiratory tract illn
esses (23.6% reduction; 95% CI, 12.7%-33.2%). Vaccination also led to fewer
days of illness across all illness syndromes (22.9% reduction for febrile
illnesses, 27.3% reduction for severe febrile illnesses), fewer days of wor
k lost (17.9% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 28.4% reduction for f
ebrile upper respiratory tract illnesses), and fewer days with health care
provider visits (24.8% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 40.9% reduct
ion for febrile upper respiratory tract illnesses). Use of prescription ant
ibiotics and over-the-counter medications was also reduced across all illne
ss syndromes. Vaccine recipients were more likely to experience runny nose
or sore throat during the first 7 days after vaccination, but serious adver
se events between the groups were not significantly different. The match be
tween the type A(H3N2) vaccine strain and the predominant circulating virus
strain (A/Sydney/05/97[H3N2]) for the 1997-1998 season was poor, suggestin
g that LAIV provided substantial cross-protection against this variant infl
uenza A virus strain.
Conclusion Intranasal trivalent LAIV vaccine was safe and effective in heal
thy, working adults in a year in which a drifted influenza A virus predomin
ated.