The traditional patient-primary care physician (PCP) relationship provides
many ethical protections for patients, including confidentiality, shared me
dical decision making, and respect for patient autonomy. Hospitalist models
, which introduce a purposeful discontinuity of care, threaten these protec
tions and raise certain ethical concerns. We analyze 2 cases that explore e
thical issues arising in hospitalist systems and suggest ways to ensure eth
ical protection for patients. The first case examines how hospitalization c
an disrupt the patient-PCP relationship and raise ethical issues regarding
confidentiality. In the second case, we discuss decision making when the pa
tient's goals and preferences for care change as a result of hospitalizatio
n. Effective hospitalist systems provide a model for a trusting patient-phy
sician relationship. Although the hospitalist must take responsibility for
inpatient management, the PCP has a key role in addressing important issues
in the hospital and providing care after discharge. As hospitalists assume
control of inpatient care, they must also provide ethical protections to p
atients to supplement those currently vested in the patient-PCP relationshi
p. An approach that keeps the patient's best interests foremost, defines a
clear role for the PCP, and takes advantage of the expertise and availabili
ty of hospitalists will best serve patients and physicians.