Until recent decennia, Delavayella Steph. and Blepharidophyllum Angstr, wer
e assigned to the Scapaniaceae. Although the former had been treated as for
ming a separate family, Delavayellaceae: more recently it has been again re
garded as a member of the Scapaniaceae. Blepharidophyllum, regarded as repr
esenting a subfamily of Scapaniaceae, is now regarded as belonging to an au
tonomous family, Blepharidophyllaceae. The three groups chiefly agree in su
perficial criteria: all have vertically oriented leaves, canaliculate or co
nduplicate; all tend to develop dentition/ciliation of leaf margins; all ha
ve frontally compressed perianths. Analysis of a suite of more fundamental
criteria shows that the Delavayellaceae are quite isolated and lack obvious
phylogenetic 'moorings'. Blepharidophyllaceae may show some remote affinit
ies to Scapaniaceae but the latter are more allied to Jungermanniaceae subf
. Lophozioideae (Lophoziaceae) than to Blepharidophyllaceae. Phylogenetic i
mplications are discussed.
Criteria of phylogenetic relevance in ordering these three families include
: (1) Rhizoid dispersion. Thus Scapaniaceae, with scattered rhizoids, appea
r to derive from lophozioid ancestors (Jungermanniaceae) versus the bundled
rhinoids of Blepharidophyllaceae - a type of rhizoid dispersion not seen i
n 'true' Jungermanniaceae. (2) Type of asexual reproduction. Thus Delavayel
laceae, with solitary, parenchymatous, pluricellular gemmae, are wholly iso
lated from Scapaniaceae and Blepharidophyllaceae, in which catenate, 1-2-ce
lled gemmae, found in branched chains, occur. (3) Leaf symmetry. Thus Delav
ayellaceae have bilobed leaves with dorsal lobes larger than ventral versus
bilobed leaves with somewhat to clearly smaller dorsal lobes in Scapaniace
ae + Blepharidophyllaceae. (4) Leaf lobing. In Blepharidophyllaceae leaves
are? aside from some derivative taxa, bisbifid; in Scapaniaceae + Belavayel
laceae they are simply bifid. (5) Shoot apex orientation. (6) Mycorrhizal r
elationships.
The three families seem joined in one basic criterion: all taxa are strongl
y bilateral, lacking any trace of appendages (underleaves, bracteoles) from
vegetative as well as gametangial regions. In this regard Scapaniaceae are
dearly distinct from Lophozioideae, in which gynoecia, aside from in some
derivative tar;a, preserve large to small bracteoles, even when vegetative
regions lack underleaves.