Ma. Campagni et al., Comparative effects of oral clonidine and intravenous esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic response to epinephrine injection, J CLIN ANES, 11(3), 1999, pp. 208-215
Study Objective: To evaluate oral clonidine and intravenous esmolol in blun
ting hemodynamic changes associated with intranasal injection of an epineph
rine-containing local anesthetic solution during general anesthesia.
Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Setting: University Medical Center.
Patients: 61 consenting ASA physical status I and II outpatients undergoing
endoscopic sinus and septoplasty surgery with general anesthesia
Interventions: All patients were assigned to receive either a placebo (P) t
ablet or a similar-appearing tablet containing either clonidine 0.2 mg (C2)
or 0.4 mg (C4) orally 1 hour prior to entering the operating room. Prior t
o the intranasal injection of epinephrine, patients were administered eithe
r saline, 0.03 ml . kg(-1) followed by an infusion of 0.016 ml . kg(-1) . m
in(-1), or esmolol (E) 300 mu g kg(-1) followed by a continuous infusion of
160 mu g . kg(-1) . min(-1).
Measurements and Main Results: Arterial blood pressure and heart rate (HR)
values were recorded preoperatively, immediately before induction of anesth
esia, and at 1-minute intervals after induction of anesthesia until 15 minu
tes after injection of an epinephrine-containing solution. Level of sedatio
n was assessed using a linear visual analog scale (VAS) prior to oral preme
dication, immediately before induction of anesthesia, and 30 minutes after
anesthesia. There were no significant differences in sedation scores among
the four treatment groups. HR following injection of epinephrine-containing
solution was significantly less in the C2, C4, and E groups than the place
bo group. Compared to P and E treatment groups, MAP values were significant
ly lower in the C4 treatment group.
Conclusion: In this healthy, young; nonsmoking outpatient population, preme
dication with oral clonidine, 0.2 to 0.4 mg; was effective in blunting the
acute hemodynamic changes associated with injection of an epinephrine-conta
ining local anesthetic solution during endoscopic sinus or septoplasty surg
ery. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc.