A sharp-based sandstone of the Viking Formation, Joffre Field, Alberta, Canada: Criteria for recognition of transgressively incised shoreface complexes
Ja. Maceachern et al., A sharp-based sandstone of the Viking Formation, Joffre Field, Alberta, Canada: Criteria for recognition of transgressively incised shoreface complexes, J SED RES, 69(4), 1999, pp. 876-892
The Viking Formation of the Joffre field comprises parts of three discrete
sequences.
Sequence 2 overlies an erosional discontinuity, termed BD-1, which is incis
ed into underlying marine parasequences of the informally named "Regional V
iking''. The surface represents a sequence boundary that was transgressivel
y modified during subsequent relative sea-level riser and is commonly demar
cated by the Glossifungites ichnofacies.Up to three parasequences are trunc
ated by BD-1, Sequence 2 comprises an incised sandstone body passing basinw
ards into a granule to pebble-bearing sandy mudstone, A complete facies suc
cession consists of a thin granule to pebble lag mantling BD-1, grading upw
ards into thoroughly bioturbated gritty sandy mudstone, through intensely b
urrowed muddy sandstone, and into interbedded hummocky cross stratified san
dstone and burrowed sandstone. The facies contain diverse and uniformly dis
tributed, open-marine trace-fossil suites displaying an upward progression
from archetypal Cruziana through proximal Cruziana and into mixed Skolithos
-Cruziana assemblages. The succession is interpreted to reflect a weakly st
orm-influenced upper offshore to proximal lower-shoreface deposit.
Incised shorefaces are allocyclically generated, and may be produced by for
ced regressive (falling stage), lowstand, or transgressive scenarios. Seque
nce 2 of the Joffre area is interpreted as a transgressively incised shoref
ace. It is distinguished from the other two sharp-based shoreface types lar
gely on the basis of the extent of the erosional component of its basal dis
continuity. In distal positions, ED-1 remains erosional even where it is ov
erlain by facies deposited below fair-weather wave base. This is inconsiste
nt with forced regressive and lowstand conditions because in weakly storm-i
nfluenced shorefaces, the regressive surface of erosion and the sequence bo
undary, respectively, pass into correlative conformities seaward of fair-we
ather wave base. Facies deposited below fair-weather wave base would theref
ore overlie the non-erosional correlative conformity surface. In a transgre
ssive scenario, however, ravinement during erosional shoreface retreat gene
rates an erosional discontinuity that may lie seaward of fair-weather wave
base during subsequent progradation, because the surface was cut prior to p
rogradation and while sea level was considerably lower, As a result, facies
deposited below fair-weather wave base can overlie the erosional discontin
uity.