Tl. Whittem et al., Effect of perioperative prophylactic antimicrobial treatment in dogs undergoing elective orthopedic surgery, J AM VET ME, 215(2), 1999, pp. 212-216
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Objective-To determine whether perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis woul
d reduce incidence of postoperative infection among dogs undergoing electiv
e orthopedic procedures.
Design-Randomized, controlled, blinded, intention clinical trial.
Animals-Dogs of any breed, sex, or age undergoing elective orthopedic surge
ry at a veterinary leaching hospital.
Procedures-Dogs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: treatment with sal
ine solution, treatment with potassium penicillin G, and treatment with cef
azolin. Treatments were intended to be administered within 30 minutes prior
to surgery; a second dose was administered if surgery lasted > 90 minutes.
Dogs were monitored for 10 to 14 days after surgery for evidence of infect
ion.
Results-After the first 112 dogs were enrolled in the study, it was found t
hat infection rate for control dogs (5/32 dogs) was significantly higher th
an the rate for dogs treated with antimicrobials (3/80 dogs). Therefore, no
more dogs were enrolled in the study. A total of 126 dogs completed the st
udy. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that compared with dogs that receive
d antimicrobials prophylactically, dogs that received saline solution devel
oped infections significantly more frequently. Difference in efficacy, howe
ver, was not observed between the 2 antimicrobial drugs used.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Results indicated that perioperative ant
imicrobial prophylaxis decreased postoperative infection rate in dogs under
going elective orthopedic surgery, compared with infection rate in control
dogs. Cefazolin was not more efficacious than potassium penicillin G in the
se dogs.